XAT 2016 Question Paper : An essential study aid for individuals getting ready for the test is the XAT Past Year Question Paper. It is highly recommended that those getting ready for the test complete the XAT First Year Question Paper for the last five years at the very least. Every year, it is released on the exam following the exam. This post contains the XAT Previous Year Question Papers for the years 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, and 2018. For further information, read the entire tale.
Table of Contents
XAT 2016 Exam Analysis
On January 3, 2016, the Xavier Aptitude Test (XAT) took place between 10 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.
The test was in two stages. The first part is a standard XAT 2016 Question Paper, with questions divided into three categories: quantitative ability and data interpretation, decision making and analytical reasoning, language and logic ability and as previously announced by XAT officials, when allowed to attempt all these questions is 170 Minutes and is.
The necessary essay writing section and general awareness questions made up the second section. This part was given a total of thirty-five minutes.
There were 26 questions in the section on verbal and logical ability. There’re twenty-three questions in the segment on decision making and twenty-nine in the section on quantitative ability and data interpretation. There were five possible answers for each question, and the points were awarded evenly. For each erroneous answer, a penalty of one-fourth of a mark was deducted. In addition, as was previously indicated, after the first 13 of these questions, there was a penalty of 0.05 marks for each question that was not attempted. This year’s paper was also very difficult.
XAT 2016 PATTERN
| Section | No. of Questions | Optimal Time in Mins | Difficulty Level | Good Attempts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verbal Ability | 26 | 45 | Moderate-Difficult | 16-18 |
| Quantitative Ability and Data Interpretation | 33 | 70 | Moderate-Difficult | 17-19 |
| Decision Making | 23 | 55 | Moderate-Difficult | 16-18 |
| Total | 140 | – | Difficult | -55 |
Detail Analysis
Verbal and Logical Ability Analysis
The overall level of difficulty in the English component increased from the previous year. XAT 2016 Question Paper: To narrow down the choices and get the answers, one would have to carefully study the questions. There were a few really difficult reading comprehension and critical reasoning questions that could only be answered via elimination. The Para Jumble questions may have been readily answered and were of a moderate difficulty level.
The breakup was as follows:
| Topic | Number of Questions | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|
| Reading Comprehension | 14 | Difficult |
| Vocabulary | 1 | Moderate |
| Para-jumble | 2 | Easy-moderate |
| Para-completion | 1 | Easy |
| CR | 7 | Difficult |
| Pronunciation | 1 | Moderate |
Decision Making and Analytical Reasoning Analysis
The decision-making level was on par with the paper from the previous year. It was a huge comfort that there were no lengthy portions this year. As a result, compared to last year, less time was needed to complete the questions, and a higher cut-off can be anticipated for this segment.
The breakup was as follows:
| Topic | Number of Questions | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|
| Situational | 18 | Moderate-Difficult |
| Mathematical + Analytical Reasoning | 5 | 3 – Easy 2 – Difficult |
Quantitative Ability and Data Interpretation Analysis
Comparatively speaking, this year’s part on quantitative ability and data interpretation was a little simpler. The majority of the 22 QA questions came from the subjects of geometry, algebra, number system, and arithmetic. While the majority of the arithmetic questions were manageable, the geometry and algebraic questions were more challenging. There were two directions-based questions with unclear terminology (Company ABC and XYZ sharing profits).
Two sets of seven questions were included in the Data Interpretation section. A couple of the questions were a little unclear.
In summary, it would have taken 20–25 minutes to tackle 2-4 DI questions.
The breakup was as follows:
| Topic | Number of Questions | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|
| P&L | 2 | Easy – Moderate |
| TSD, Work | 2 | Easy – Moderate |
| Number System | 2 | Easy – Moderate |
| Algebra | 3 | Easy – Moderate |
| Puzzles | 1 | Easy – Moderate |
| Geometry, Mensuration | 8 | Moderate – Difficult |
| Clocks | 1 | Moderate |
| Trigonometry | 1 | Easy |
| Functions | 1 | Easy |
| Set Theory | 1 | Moderate |
| DI – Table Based | 3 | Difficult |
| DI- Combination | 4 | Difficult |
General Awareness Analysis
Compared to last year, the General Awareness part was somewhat more challenging. There were 25 questions in this section. The majority of the questions consisted of a single statement. There were many right statements in some of the multiple-statement questions. Given that each question asked for knowledge of each assertion on its own, the students may have been perspiring while responding. Static GK (Economy, Geography, Science, Science and Technology) and Current GK (Business economy and miscellaneous) are the main areas from which the questions were asked. There were no questions from the history, sports, or politics sections this year compared to last. The GK portion is generally considered to be “moderate-difficult” in difficulty. A 10–11 question attempt with a 7-8 score can be taken into consideration good.
Essay Writing Analysis
This part of the test consisted of an essay. The topic of the essay was “Technology and Nature are natural enemies”. Like every year, XAT came with a very interesting topic yet again, on which students could ponder and bring out various perspectives. Compared to previous year this topic was easy as in past years XAT had a tendency to give topics that were either abstract or philosophical
XAT'2016 Cutoffs Analysis
| Section | XLRI BM | XLRI HRM | XLRI GMP | XIMB BM | XIMB HRM | SP Jain | GIM | IMT | Great Lakes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA | 7 (80%ile) | 8 (90%ile) | – | 6 (75%ile) | 6 (75%ile) | – | – | – | |
| DM | 9.5 (80%ile) | 9.5 (80%ile) | – | 8 (75%ile) | 8 (75%ile) | – | – | – | |
| QADI | 10 (90%ile) | 7 (70%ile) | – | 7.25 (75%ile) | 7.25 (75%ile) | – | – | – | |
| Overall | 31-33 | 29-31 | 26-28 | 29-31 | 26-28 | 31-33 | 26-28 | 29-31 | 26-28 |
Overview of the Previous Year's XAT Question Paper
Increasing Self-Belief
Gaining familiarity with the exam format and question types by going through the XAT Previous Year Papers PDF will greatly increase your self-assurance.
As you gain familiarity with the structure and degree of difficulty, you’ll feel less nervous and better prepared on test day.
Improving Speed and Accuracy
XAT Previous Year Papers PDF exercise on a regular basis might help you become more accurate and faster.
You can improve your ability to answer questions accurately and swiftly by pacing yourself and practicing in genuine test situations.
Improving Your Time Management Ability
Effective time management is one of the most important components of the XAT exam. By practicing with the XAT Previous Year Papers PDF, you may make sure you can finish the exam in the allotted time by creating a time management plan for the various sections and questions.
Understanding the Examiner's Mentality
The XAT Previous Year Papers PDF offer an insight into the priorities and thinking of the examiner. With this knowledge, you may adjust your study to better fit the requirements of the test and raise your chances of achieving a good score.
Conclusion
The XAT 2016 Question Paper : The XAT Question Paper is a crucial tool for those trying to score well on the test. Through in-depth examination of the question paper, comprehension of the degree of difficulty, and consistent practice, you may increase your readiness and raise your chances of success. Recall that the secret to doing well on the XAT exam is to be consistent and dedicated. If you use the information from the XAT question paper to inform your preparation approach, you will have no trouble reaching your MBA goals.
